Paul Grogan is the president and CEO of the Boston Foundation. Through its grant making to non-profit organizations, it responds to critical challenges to a constantly changing community by supporting high-impact, innovative programs. Below, Paul is interviewed about Collaboration in Massachusetts. See more industry leaders speak about Collaboration here.
What’s the hardest part about collaboration?
As a colleague once said: “Collaboration is an unnatural act between non-consenting adults.”
People are often very comfortable doing their own work. You may realize intellectually that an industry may benefit from a collaborative effort, but if there doesn’t seem to be a good process, a lot of collaboration dies on the vine. If it doesn’t appear to be generating results, people tend to go back to their own cubbyhole. It’s crucial that the value proposition be demonstrated fairly early, that people can see the potential payoff.
How did you first become an advocate of collaboration?
My first extensive experience with collaboration was when I was in city government in Boston in the 1970s and 1980s, helping to administer federal government grants. The work started in the Carter administration and accelerated during the Reagan years. Whole parts of city government were defined by the administration of federal grants, attempting to solve problems. It was an era of extraordinary public-private partnerships, reaching out to the business community and the philanthropic sector. It was a process of discovering the power of collaborative partnerships. I was captivated by the opportunity to work across institutional lines to solve problems.
How has it influenced your work at The Boston Foundation?
Collaboration has not necessarily been a strong suit of the city historically. There’s been a lot of fractiousness and division, I think.
There was clearly a lack of collaboration at the region’s failure to lead in the computing revolution after a certain point.
At The Boston Foundation, we’ve been very interested in systematic collaboration that can actually make a difference. We were very pleased to have played a role in the idea of the Massachusetts Life Sciences Collaborative, helping to put the whole cluster together in a strategic partnership. It’s really rolling now.
I think that this is the kind of approach that can work across a number of sectors with the right leadership and buy-in and focus. We’d love it if this kind of collaboration took hold as a modus operandi in a number of sectors.
What do you think is the key to creating successful collaboration? What are the challenges?
It’s more a question on understanding what’s going on; is there a role that we can play? With the Life Sciences collaborative, we played a role in pulling everyone back together, in being persistent, after initial efforts had floundered. We had the convening power to put up some initial resources.
In terms of challenges, the marketing of the city and the region has been very deficient. We haven’t made the most of what we have. We have these incredible assets that the world envies – our higher education, our talent level, our universities and hospitals.
Some believe that it will speak for itself; if you don’t recognize how great and wonderful we are, that’s your problem. It’s crazy.
Massachusetts is traditionally not seen as a pro-business environment. We don’t have a tradition of courting industry. It has been done episodically, fitfully. One of the hopes I have is that these multiplying collaboratives create a new culture of inspiration for prosperity and job growth.
I once asked the CEO of a large corporation located here: How many times had the CEO been visited by a politician at any level and asked to engage in creating more jobs? The response: That conversation has never occurred.
We need to build this new culture to help encourage job growth and prosperity. To be the place where the private sector is growing their companies, because of the innovations coming out the innovations.
Recent Comments